Mitchell Krueger v Marcel Latak
Match preview, prediction and odds
Our pick
LeanWONM. Krueger is 4-6 over the last ten and 13-20 on hard this season. M. Latak is 6-4 over the last ten and 7-4 on hard this season.
The pick is M. Krueger to win 2-0. We make it a 52% chance, so it is only worth backing at 1.91 or bigger. At 1.36 that is not there yet - leave it, or wait for the price to drift in-play (an early break against usually does it).
An opinion from the numbers, not a guarantee. 19+, bet responsibly.
Key numbers
| M. Krueger | M. Latak | |
|---|---|---|
| 381 | Ranking | - |
| 4-6 | Last 10 | 6-4 |
| LWLLL | Last 5 | LWWWW |
| +0.0 | V the odds | -1.0 |
| 16-25 | Season | 7-6 |
| 13-20 | Hard 2026 | 7-4 |
| 2 | Last 7 days | 1 |
| 3d | Days rest | 5d |
| 0 | Wins here | 0 |
| Clear | Fitness | Clear |
| Head to head First meeting |
V the odds: wins above (or below) what the prices expected over the last 10 - form with the strength of the opposition built in.
The market
Percentages are the implied chance of winning with the bookmaker's margin removed.
Head to head
| Date | Event | Match | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-01 | Charlottesville | M. KruegervM. Latak | 6-1 6-0 |
This season & this event
Ranking points fall off a year after they are earned, so a player who went deep here last year must match it or drop in the rankings. That shapes effort in a way the price does not always show.
The players

Ranking, record and surface splits are for the most recent season on file. Height, weight and handedness are not published by our data provider.
M. Krueger — last 10
With the pre-match price we recorded at the time.
| Date | Event | Surface | Opponent | Score | Their price | Market | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-02 | Charlottesville | Hard | A. Fenty | 1.39 | 68% | LOST | |
Games in each set6-7 6-3 1-6 KruegerFentyPoints won48%52%Serve points won55%60%Return points won40%45%Games held9 of 1410 of 14Break points saved7 of 121 of 5Aces74Double faults15 | |||||||
| 2026-11-01 | Charlottesville | Hard | M. Latak | 1.21 | 78% | WON | |
Games in each set6-1 6-0 KruegerLatakPoints won74%26%Serve points won82%35%Return points won65%18%Games held7 of 71 of 6Break points saved0 of 03 of 8Aces10Double faults25 | |||||||
| 2026-10-29 | Sioux Falls | Hard (Indoor) | Dar. Blanch | 3.60 | 73% | LOST | |
Games in each set7-6 4-6 5-7 KruegerBlanchPoints won48%52%Serve points won59%61%Return points won39%41%Games held12 of 1714 of 17Break points saved3 of 89 of 12Aces516Double faults55 | |||||||
| 2026-10-26 | Sioux Falls | Hard (Indoor) | A. Andrade | 2.37 | 59% | WON | |
Games in each set6-3 6-0 KruegerAndradePoints won65%35%Serve points won74%45%Return points won55%26%Games held8 of 83 of 7Break points saved2 of 23 of 7Aces31Double faults02 | |||||||
| 2026-10-19 | Fort Worth (Usa) | Hard | J. Brooksby | 6.30 | 85% | LOST | |
Games in each set6-3 3-6 2-6 KruegerBrooksbyPoints won46%54%Serve points won61%74%Return points won26%39%Games held10 of 1312 of 13Break points saved5 of 82 of 3Aces13Double faults14 | |||||||
| 2026-10-14 | M25 Austin, TX | Hard | S. Mitsui | 1.42 | 67% | LOST | |
Games in each set5-7 2-6 KruegerMitsuiPoints won43%57%Serve points won49%63%Return points won37%51%Games held5 of 108 of 10Break points saved1 of 52 of 4 | |||||||
| 2026-10-03 | Columbus | Hard (Indoor) | A. Shelbayh | 2.15 | 55% | LOST | |
Games in each set2-6 2-6 KruegerShelbayhPoints won40%60%Serve points won53%73%Return points won27%47%Games held4 of 88 of 8Break points saved6 of 104 of 4Aces38Double faults12 | |||||||
| 2026-10-02 | Columbus | Hard (Indoor) | K. Smith | 2.11 | 54% | WON | |
Games in each set6-4 7-6 KruegerSmithPoints won53%47%Serve points won78%68%Return points won32%22%Games held11 of 1110 of 11Break points saved1 of 15 of 6Aces214Double faults04 | |||||||
| 2026-10-01 | Columbus | Hard (Indoor) | S. Kozlov | 1.87 | 51% | WON | |
Games in each set6-2 3-6 6-3 KruegerKozlovPoints won54%46%Serve points won60%51%Return points won49%40%Games held9 of 137 of 13Break points saved6 of 109 of 15Aces94Double faults37 | |||||||
| 2026-09-28 | Columbus | Hard (Indoor) | T. Zink | 1.67 | 57% | WON | |
Games in each set7-6 6-3 KruegerZinkPoints won54%46%Serve points won67%57%Return points won43%33%Games held9 of 117 of 10Break points saved3 of 56 of 9Aces98Double faults33 | |||||||
M. Latak — last 10
With the pre-match price we recorded at the time.
| Date | Event | Surface | Opponent | Score | Their price | Market | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-01 | Charlottesville | Hard | M. Krueger | 4.30 | 78% | LOST | |
Games in each set1-6 0-6 LatakKruegerPoints won26%74%Serve points won35%82%Return points won18%65%Games held1 of 67 of 7Break points saved3 of 80 of 0Aces01Double faults52 | |||||||
| 2026-10-27 | M25 Las Vegas, Nv 2 (Usa), Hard | — | E. Kohlmann | 2.19 | 56% | LOST | |
Games in each set4-6 6-3 2-6 LatakKohlmannPoints won47%53%Serve points won49%56%Return points won44%51%Games held7 of 148 of 13Break points saved6 of 132 of 7 | |||||||
| 2026-09-12 | US Open | Hard | L. A. Miguel | — | — | WON | |
Games in each set3-6 7-5 7-6 LatakMiguelPoints won50%50%Serve points won54%54%Return points won46%46%Games held11 of 1810 of 16Break points saved5 of 124 of 10 | |||||||
| 2026-09-11 | US Open | Hard | J. Mackenzie | — | — | WON | |
Games in each set6-3 7-6 LatakMackenziePoints won53%47%Serve points won69%66%Return points won34%31%Games held10 of 118 of 11Break points saved0 of 11 of 3 | |||||||
| 2026-09-10 | US Open | Hard | K. Hance | — | — | WON | |
Games in each set6-4 6-4 LatakHancePoints won53%47%Serve points won66%64%Return points won36%34%Games held10 of 108 of 10Break points saved3 of 35 of 7 | |||||||
| 2026-09-09 | US Open | Hard | D. Kisimov | — | — | WON | |
Games in each set6-3 6-3 LatakKisimovPoints won58%42%Serve points won72%55%Return points won45%28%Games held9 of 105 of 9Break points saved0 of 13 of 7 | |||||||
| 2026-09-08 | US Open | Hard | T. Chavez | — | — | WON | |
Games in each set7-6 6-4 LatakChavezPoints won53%47%Serve points won52%46%Return points won54%48%Games held6 of 115 of 12Break points saved0 of 510 of 16 | |||||||
| 2026-09-07 | US Open | Hard | Z. Sesko | — | — | WON | |
Games in each set7-5 6-3 LatakSeskoPoints won56%44%Serve points won66%55%Return points won45%34%Games held9 of 107 of 11Break points saved4 of 51 of 5 | |||||||
| 2026-07-02 | Wimbledon | Grass | S. Rybkin | — | — | LOST | |
Games in each set1-6 7-6 9-11 | |||||||
| 2026-06-17 | M15 Irvine | Hard | V. Kalina | 3.03 | 69% | LOST | |
Games in each set6-7 4-6 | |||||||
Common questions
Who is favourite, Mitchell Krueger or Marcel Latak?
Mitchell Krueger is favourite at 1.21, which is a 78% chance once the bookmaker's margin is removed.
What are the odds for Mitchell Krueger vs Marcel Latak?
Mitchell Krueger is 1.21 and Marcel Latak is 4.30, the prices we recorded for the Charlottesville match.
What is the head-to-head between Mitchell Krueger and Marcel Latak?
They have met 1 time and Mitchell Krueger leads 1-0.
Who will win Mitchell Krueger vs Marcel Latak?
Our model makes it Mitchell Krueger to win 2-0 at 1.36 (Lean confidence).